The Chief magistrate hopes to be able to listen to the hearing by 30/4/2018, which means Uber will be allowed to run (temporarily) until that date and beyond, until fulfilment of the appeal.
After an attorney’s office in Northern California brought up a hidden letter form Uber on how to tackle competitors.
Have yor litigaiton boosted by this platform reporting insights from further cases and managing evidences and testimonies.
Apparently Uber withheld evidence and got busted by the judge.
Dutch courts are less expensive, more tech-savvy and less burdensome then British courts when it comes to litigation.
Considering the uncertianty generated by rexit and the upcoming NCC (Dutch Commercial Court), as well as worldwide reputation and heuight in justive rankings and efficiency, why turning to UK courts?
A federal magistrate denied PWC’s request to put a cap on the number of plaintiffs against which the company has allegedly played discrimination: based on the (older) age, various applicants have not been retained for job openings.
UK: glad to see this Brit court awarded basic rgiths to workers.
As you ay know, Uber doesn’t pay holidays nor sick leaves to its partners/freelancers/drivers.
Uber is lucky this ruling is not immediately applicable but it will appeal anyway.
-Popcorns heating up-
The once-used-arbitration, conceived as a way to reduce costs and speed up process, looks now like an abused right to higher costs and limit litigation, even towards employees.
First Lawyer in the Netherlands to avail himself of he digital litigation.